digital literature
The digital literature in class really seemed weird to me. When we started watching the asteroids game in class it to me was frustrating. I spent the whole time watching and trying to make some connection between the words that were used. Then I began to think of 2 possibilities The was there is no connection at all and it was just a bunch of words flying around symbolizing are thought process in our head being nothing more than just a bunch of stuff flying around waiting to used. The other idea was that they were some type subliminal messages. To me I think some of the interaction helps the authors. The author of the “Lies Project” Emily Herment, she opens it up and lets the readers post anonously as they feel. This offers you to be able to offer any thing you feel at the moment no matter how silly or real. Although I do feel that the asteroids game is made poorer from the ability to shoot and blow up words. The significance of this I’m still unsure about. All of these I feel are still literature because the all spark a response and try to express or convey something. This is what I think that literature was built on and why it can be interrupted in so many different ways